Assessing Teachers’ Pedagogy, Curriculum and Assessment Adherence to Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers

Authors

  • Analie Cordero West Visayas State University-Lambunao Campus
  • Nick John Solar Janiuay National Comprehensive High School, Janiuay, Iloilo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v7i1.137

Keywords:

content knowledge and pedagogy assessment, descriptive-comparative research in education, Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers, public school teacher performance, teacher adherence to professional standards

Abstract

This study examined the level of adherence of public school teachers to the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST), with a specific focus on the domains of content knowledge and pedagogy, curriculum and planning, and assessment and reporting. It further investigated whether adherence levels significantly differ across demographic and professional variables, including school level, sex, age, highest educational attainment, frequency of participation in professional development seminars, and length of service. Employing a descriptive-comparative research design using a survey method, the study drew data from 137 public school teachers selected through stratified random sampling. The sample size was determined using Slovin’s formula at a 5% margin of error. Findings revealed that the overall level of adherence among both elementary and secondary school teachers was *very satisfactory*. Among the three domains, teachers demonstrated the strongest adherence to content knowledge and pedagogy, followed by assessment and reporting, and then curriculum and planning. Statistical analysis indicated a significant difference in adherence across age groups, whereas no significant differences were found based on sex, educational attainment, school level, frequency or sponsoring entity of professional development seminars, or tenure. These results underscore the importance of targeted support for teachers at different career stages, particularly in sustaining adherence to professional standards across age demographics.

References

Abay, J. R., & Morallo, M. B. (2019). Gaps on quality teaching: Assessing teachers’ needs towards the creation of a framework for an extension program on teachers’ professional development. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(3), 28-36.

Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2016). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video‐based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259-1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21271

Atim, B. C. N. (2017). Ang Diskurso ni Feorillo Petronilo Demeterio tungkol sa Pilosopiyang Pilipino: Isang pagsusuri. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 11(2).

Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92

Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.) McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Cortez, Franz Giuseppe (2013). The Philippine engagement with Paulo Freire. Kritike 7(2), 50-70. https://doi.org/ 10.25138/7.2.a.4

Cortez, F. G. F. (2013b). The prospect of liberating pedagogy in the thoughts of Amable G. Tuibeo. Mabini Review, 1(2), 16-68.

Cortez, F. G. F. (2016). Critical rethinking of critical thinking: A contribution of critical pedagogy in facing the challenges of K+12. Kritike, 10(1), 315-330. https://doi.org/ 10.25138/10.1.a.16

DepEd Order No. 73, s 2012. Guidelines on the Assessment and Rating of Outcomes under the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/downloads/2012/09sep/20120905-DepEd-DO-0073-BSA.pdf

Gepila Jr, E. (2020). Assessing teachers using Philippine standards for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 739-746. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080302

Harrison, C., & Killion, J. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational leadership, 65(1), 74.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2017). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Pearson Higher Ed.

Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) (2017). Department of Education - Teacher Education Council. Retrieved December 8, 2020 from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DO_s2017_042-1.pdf

Plata, S. (2018). Minding the Gap: Exploring assessment education in CHED’s teacher preparation program in the context of PPST and DepEd’s assessment reform. In DLSU Research Congress.

Pompea, S. M., & Walker, C. E. (2017, May). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in curriculum development for illumination engineering. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. 104526R). Optica Publishing Group., China. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2270022

Regalado, M. (2017). Career Mobility and Gender: A Descriptive Study of Selected DepEd Teachers in Iligan City. Asia Pacific Society for Public Affairs.

Viola, M. (2009). The Filipinization of critical pedagogy: Widening the scope of critical educational theory. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 7(1), 1-28.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-29

How to Cite

Cordero, A., & Solar, N. J. (2025). Assessing Teachers’ Pedagogy, Curriculum and Assessment Adherence to Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers . Romblon State University Research Journal, 7(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v7i1.137

Issue

Section

Research Article