Strategic Management Plans of Public School Principals in Basic Education: Unpacking Thoughts, Actions and Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v6i1.172Keywords:
content analysis, educational planning, educational quality, evaluation, strategic management, school principals, primary education, leadershipAbstract
This study explored the strategic management plans of public school principals in primary education, focusing on their theoretical underpinnings, alignment with legal mandates, appropriateness, financial support, implementation, and evaluation. The research used documentary content analysis to examine strategic management plans from diverse public schools in the Schools Division of Romblon. Semi-structured interviews with principals provided additional insights. The study revealed that educational theories and models, such as SWOT Analysis, Balanced Scorecard, and Theory of Change, are effective in guiding decision-making. Strong alignment with legal and curricular mandates was observed, though challenges related to resource constraints and rapid policy changes were noted. The appropriateness of objectives, activities, and assessment tools was evident, with clear linkages to the school vision. However, disparities in financial support posed implementation challenges. Successes included improved student outcomes and community engagement, while lessons emphasized flexibility and stakeholder involvement. The evaluation employed diverse methods and criteria, informing future planning. The findings highlight the critical role of comprehensive strategic management in enhancing educational quality and principals' leadership. Recommendations include ongoing professional development, increased financial support, stakeholder engagement, and adoption of comprehensive evaluation frameworks.
References
Baker, B. D. (2018). Educational inequality and school finance: Why money matters for America's students. Harvard Education Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231268
Bredeson, P. V. (2000). The school principal's role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200114
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
Chermack, T. J., & Kasshanna, B. K. (2019). The use and misuse of SWOT analysis and implications for H.R.D. professionals. Human Resource Development International, 22(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1534681
Clarke, S., & Wildy, H. (2011). Providing professional sustenance for leaders of learning: The glass half full? Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 590--610. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111174847
Cohen-Vogel, L., & McLendon, M. K. (2012). New approaches to understanding federal involvement in education. In Handbook of education policy research (pp. 735-748). Routledge.
Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center on Educational Governance.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203105305
Decramer, A., Smolders, C., Vanderstraeten, A., & Christiaens, J. (2022). The balanced scorecard in education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211001095
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Harvard Education Press.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson.
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin Press.
Grubb, W. N., & Hyman, J. B. (2020). Financing schools and educational programs: Policy insights. Springer.
Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51). https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832
Hanushek, E. A. (2006). School resources. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, 5(2), 865-908. North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02014-9
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2020). Transformational school leadership in a transactional policy world. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 484-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2019-0136
Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. Guilford Press.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman Publishers.
Poister, T. H., Pitts, D. W., & Edwards, L. H. (2013). Strategic management research in the public sector: A review, synthesis, and future directions. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), 481-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013489947
Spillane, J. P. (2018). Leading and managing instruction: The practice of instructional improvement. Elementary School Journal, 119(1), 51--74. https://doi.org/10.1086/700600
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3--34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The C.I.P.P. evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press.
Weiss, C. H. (1995). Less practical than good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, 65-92. Aspen Institute. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231268.n4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Romblon State University Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
