Acceptability of Paper Folding-Based Instructional Material in Geometry

Authors

  • Sharon Galicha
  • Metelyn Lazaro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v4i2.66

Abstract

The study focused on the acceptability of a developed supplementary learning material (SLM) in geometry in terms of adequacy, clarity, contents, objectives, suitability and usefulness.  It was subjected to the scrutiny of competent DepEd Mathematics teachers and professors in mathematics at two universities, Romblon State University and De La Salle University.  The study concludes that the developed SLM titled “Paper Folding in Geometry” is highly acceptable in terms of adequacy, clarity, content, objectives, suitability, and usefulness.  It was also revealed that there is no significant difference between the level of acceptability between the teacher-evaluators from CHED and those from DepED. The development of the SLM is on its initial stage yet as it has to be pilot tested with grade six elementary pupils as participants.

 

Keywords: supplementary learning material, paper folding, development, validity

References

Auditor, E. & Naval, D. J. (2014). Development and validation of tenth grade Physics modules based on selected least mastered competencies. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 145-152.

Boakes, N. (2008). Origami-mathematics lessons: Paper folding as a teaching tool. Mathitudes 1(1), 1-9.

Cruz, C. L. I.., & Rivera, C. K. (2022). Development and validation of project-based module for selected topics in Biology. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 3(3), 1124–1137.

Dewi, I. & Haharap, M. (2016). The development of Geometri teaching materials based on constructivism to improve the students’ mathematic reasoning ability through cooperative learning jigsaw at the Class VIII of SMP Negeri 3 Padangsidimpuan. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 68-82.

Tan-Espinar, M. J. F., & Ballado, R. S. (2017). Content validity and acceptability of a developed worktext in Basic Mathematics 2. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 72-84.

Evangelista, E. V., Ayuste, T. D., Belmi, R. M., Butron, B. R., Cortez, L. S., Evangelista, L. T., Fernandez, E. V. M., Garcia, G. S., Limson, B. M., Tondo, J. E. (2014). Development and evaluation of grade 7 and grade 8 biokit. The Normal Lights, 8(2), 152-171.

Galicha, S. M. & Lazaro, M. S. (2019). Contextualization of Geometric concepts through paper folding: Basis for development of instructional materials in Geometry. Unpublished manuscript.

Instructional Design (2015). The ADDIE Model. http:// www.instructionaldesign.org/models/addie.html

Kapur, R. (2019) Development of teaching-learning materials. Unpublished manuscript.

Llego, M.A. (2018). A call for submission for evaluation of supplementary learning resources for public school libraries. Teacherph. https://www.teacherph.com/supplementary-learning-resources/

Molano, R. R. (2020). Development and validation of learning material in statistics and

probability. ASEAN Journal of Basic and Higher Education, 3(1).

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principle and standards for school Mathematic, United States of America: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/

Ocampo, C.A., de Mesa D. B., Ole, A. F., Auditor E., Morales, M. E., Sia, S. D., Palomar, B. C. (2015). Development and evaluation of PHYSICS MICROLAB (P6-Μlab) Kit. The Normal Lights, 9(1), 134-158.

Pangesti, F. (2012). Pengembangan bahan ajar pendidikan berpikir (kritis dan kreatif) berbahasa Indonesia sma melalui pembelajaran lintas mata pelajaran. Pendidikan Bahasa dan sastra, Journal of University of Malang.

Pastor, C.J.M., Aranes, F. Q., Datukan, J. T., Duad, V., Bantang, J. O., Espinosa, A. A., Garcia, N., Marasigan, A. C., Camacho, V. I., Roque, A. P., Nueva España, R. C., Avilla, R. A., Ocampo, C. A. (2015). Initial validation of the chemistry microlab kit (Chem. μLab Kit) in facilitating learning of selected chemistry concepts for k-12 science. The Normal Lights, 9(2), 180-204.

Rogayan, D.V. & Dollete, L.F. (2019). Development and validation of Physical Science workbook for Senior High School. Science Education International, 30(4), 284-290. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.5

Salcedo, R. E. (2016). Acceptability of a developed teaching module on selected writings of Jose Rizal. Southeast Asian Journal of Science, 1(1), 90-97.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching(2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.

Torrefranca, E. C. (2017). Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights, 11(1).

Wijaya, P.D. & Rohmadi, M. (2009). Pragmatic Discourse Analysis: Theory and Analysis Study. Surakarta: Yuma Pressindo.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-18

How to Cite

Galicha, S., & Lazaro, M. (2023). Acceptability of Paper Folding-Based Instructional Material in Geometry. Romblon State University Research Journal, 4(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v4i2.66

Issue

Section

Research Article